Use the available teacher resources to orient yourself to the game (especially the Game Guide), and hold a pre-game discussion with your class. Then have students play the game and schedule a post-game discussion afterward to discuss the experience. The Teacher's Guide includes tips on preparation, activities to orient you and your class, a mini-lesson, a follow-up activity, and an assessment, as well as links to external resources that can help you teach your students to use critical-thinking skills to spot fake news and misinformation. For teachers looking to do the most with the game, this guide can be adapted to last up to three periods of class time. If students are struggling to succeed in the game, remind them that it's not all about site integrity. Have them look at posts' thumbs-up and thumbs-down numbers to see what readers think. Also remind them about focus: Articles may be completely legitimate, but if they don't fit the topic of the site, their presence will bring the metrics down. When students finish the game, they are shown all of their game data and can print out a certificate. Students can use these to compare notes with classmates and strive to improve their scores.
Teachers might also want to extend learning by having students reflect on their own relationship with social media and the news. Talk to students about how they use social media and what kind of role it has in their lives. Find out where they get their news, and how they decide where to get their news. Is all of their information from Facebook and Twitter? Do they watch TV? Read newspapers? Do they discuss what they learn with their parents, friends, or family? For help facilitating these conversations and using them to dig deeper into news and media literacy, check out this toolkit.Continue reading Show less
NewsFeed Defenders is a social media and news literacy game put together by the people at iCivics in partnership with FactCheck.org. The game's aim is to help students understand the essential qualities of good journalism, how news goes viral, and common tactics employed in news to deceive or manipulate reads.
To learn these things, students take control of a fictional social news site called Newsably. After choosing a topic for their version of Newsably (Student Life, Health & Wellness, or Sports & Entertainment), students take on roles within the site, over time gaining responsibilities and leveling up from guest user to site administrator. As they level up, they gain abilities, such as adding new posts, choosing featured posts, commenting, and approving or reporting posts. Along the way, students work to spot ads that masquerade as news articles, dubious sources and facts, and one-sided opinion pieces. Students can also add positive comments to a post to encourage more posts of that type or add negative comments to decrease posts.
The ultimate goal is to increase the integrity, traffic, and focus of the site over a 14-day period. To do so, students must follow the site's five rules (accuracy, transparency, trustworthiness, impartiality, and focus) and make sure all posts abide by these rules. Students investigate the credibility of posts and report any that don't abide by the rules; students must then declare which rules the posts break. Each action taken uses up a certain amount of time for the current day, so students must choose their actions carefully to be efficient. Once they max out their integrity, however, students can either choose to end the game or keep playing.
The news feed format is a nice hook for students; it's both novel and familiar enough to orient students quickly to gameplay. Students can jump right into reading and researching the short, fictional news stories, deciding whether or not the stories are reputable and on-topic. As they read and analyze the stories, students learn how to spot fake news, bad reporting, and off-topic stories. They learn how to use independent sources to verify news facts and sources, evaluate articles for bias, and keep the site's interest high. Since they must spend their in-game time efficiently, students learn to choose the most effective investigative paths to take. When students report posts, they must choose which of the rules the post violates, and since students can lose points if they report incorrectly, they quickly learn to investigate posts before passing judgment.
Students can also improve the metrics of the site by posting articles themselves, choosing among three articles to post. Unfortunately, there's not a way to investigate the articles before choosing among them; being able to do so would be an improvement, as would more in-game guidance and feedback, specifically on which options to choose and why incorrect reporting choices are incorrect. Students can re-read the five site rules and check the metrics, but making connections and correlations is up to them. It must also be said that the simulated news feed environment has its benefits and drawbacks. On the one hand, it's a protected, appropriate environment for students of a variety of ages and maturity levels. On the other, it doesn't have the built-in engagement of practicing these skills in the real world with the trickiness -- and more transferrable learning -- that evaluating real articles provides. Because of this, Newsfeed Defenders is a good way to jump-start news literacy conversations in a classroom, but it should be supplemented with real-world investigation.
Key Standards Supported
Reading Informational Text
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language of a court opinion differs from that of a newspaper).
Analyze in detail how an author’s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text (e.g., a section or chapter).
Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose.
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze how an author uses and refines the meaning of a key term or terms over the course of a text (e.g., how Madison defines faction in Federalist No. 10).
Analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the structure an author uses in his or her exposition or argument, including whether the structure makes points clear, convincing, and engaging.
Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text in which the rhetoric is particularly effective, analyzing how style and content contribute to the power, persuasiveness or beauty of the text.
No one has reviewed this tool yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.Add your rating