Stellar program scaffolds the writing process with peer review and feedback

Learning rating

Community rating

Based on 3 reviews

Privacy rating

Expert evaluation by Common Sense



Subjects & Topics

English Language Arts, English-Language Learning

Price: Free to try
Platforms: Web

Pros: Shows students the power of process. Helps students give and use peer feedback.

Cons: Everything is customizable, so expect a lot of prep up front to get things just right.

Bottom Line: This is an intelligently structured tool for teaching writing and review that focuses on process as much as product.

Teachers can use Writable as the foundation for their school writing program. To get started, have students join with a class code, or import and sync your classes with Google Classroom, Canvas, Schoology, or HMH. Co-teachers can also join the class with an invitation. The intuitively organized Explore tab is a great place to begin. Teachers can quickly click through the Featured sections for contemporary cross-curricular short articles, videos, and prompts for a specific lesson or check out the Short Response section for argumentative, informational, and narrative prompts. Take note as well of the SEL-focused prompts based on the CASEL framework, covering narrative writing for Self-Awareness, Responsible Decision-Making, and Relationship Skills. These prompts could serve as great class openers. When you find a suitable prompt, copy it to your assignments, modify the prompt, supports, and rubrics as needed, and then assign out.

As students practice writing in response to prompts and participate in peer review cycles, teachers can manage the class through the dashboard and provide feedback to students throughout their writing journey. The dashboard shows info on individual students as well as the class, drilling down through categories, skills, standards, and even checklists and rubrics. Students who need extra help and practice are flagged for teachers. Teachers can also work together as grade- and content-level teams to align assessments using exemplars for different writing levels. 

Teachers will also want to check out the accessibility features and make sure students are aware of their options. All students can toggle on audio instructions for each writing prompt, and teachers can enable additional scaffolds such as starter sentences or paragraphs and prefilled graphic organizers for specific students. Students can also respond to prompts with video or audio recordings or images. Spanish-speaking students who are learning English can toggle the navigation menu between English and Spanish. 

Writable is an extensive web-based writing program. It focuses on a recursive writing process with a lot of peer and teacher feedback. Content covers all major writing genres taught in grades 3 to 12: argumentative/persuasive, narrative, and informational/expository. As they complete assignments, students learn how to respond to prompts in quick writes, short responses, multiparagraph essays, and extended writing projects with multiple revisions. Schools that use six traits, writing workshop, and other instructional methods will find that the program works with any of those methods in multiple content areas. Teachers manage the peer feedback and revision process and can jump in to provide additional feedback and assistance. In the anonymous peer review process, students use the rubric to assist with evaluating the writing, assign stars, and provide written feedback. Writers receive and incorporate the feedback, and then the writing goes back to the reviewers for another look. In addition, teachers can assign evaluations of the peer feedback.

In addition to peer feedback, Writable has added a new tool called RevisionAid that analyzes writing and provides automatic, specific feedback, adding another layer in the revision cycle. Students click a button in the writing area and receive recommendations with color-coded stars that categorize the type of feedback. Teachers enable RevisionAid when assigning a writing prompt or project and then review that data as part of the dashboard reports. There are also some additions to support virtual and hybrid learning, including recording and embedding video, providing video and audio feedback, printable reading passages, and differentiated prompts for any assignment as well as more grading control over multisection assignments.

Schools that use Chromebooks and Google Classroom can import their rosters into Writable and set it up to sync with Classroom assignments. Students can write and submit from Google Docs and save the writing to their drive. If schools use the Canvas or Schoology learning management systems (LMS), teachers install the Writable app and then create assignments. The process is slightly different for each, so make sure to verify the steps for your LMS. Students will see their assignments when they log in.

Writable's biggest strength is in its scaffolding of each step of the writing, revision, and feedback process, and how it supports the assessment of both writing and feedback. It helps students by organizing the process and helps teachers monitor the students as writers, revisers, and reviewers. This focus on students as reviewers -- not just writers and revisers -- is particularly notable. While drafting and revising one's work is an important part of the writing process, research supports that peer review is an equally important skill. Writable supports this focus with its Practice Peer Review assignments, and in the way that giving feedback is integrated and assessed alongside drafting and revision. It's a unique approach among competitors in the edtech writing space and is laudable. 

Writable also gets other things right, like making sure there are accessibility features and detailed graphic organizers that support all students, including ELLs and those who struggle with focus and executive function. In addition, the reports that teachers get provide valuable information that'll shape instructional decisions, and the "team grading" feature -- which provides groups of teachers the ability to norm grading and identify exemplars -- also shows a keen understanding of how tech can support teachers. Although this leads to the big caveat with Writable: There's a lot to it, and learning how to use all of Writable's features requires a significant time investment. But since it's a tool that teachers can rely on to anchor their curriculum, that initial investment over, say, a summer, will be worth it. Every element of the program is useful and thoughtfully designed to support effective writing.

Learning Rating

Overall Rating

Teachers can find a relevant topic among the pile of prompts spanning all genres. Students can choose freewrites that interest them, and they'll get feedback that'll drive them forward.


Exceptional scaffolding for students, and revision is elevated to a place of prominence -- as it should be. The writing prompts align well with curricula and state assessments.


Students get tons of feedback and can write responses or submit video or audio recordings. Teachers get actionable data, and teacher teams can calibrate assessments. Tons of support videos and courses.

Community Rating

Amazing supplemental writing tool!

The customization of which readings an educator selects, how and what questions are asked, and the rubric's wording is great for educators supplementing their assignments or incorporating someone else's materials, enabling less time for curating. The formatting can be modeled after tests like the SAT, which is very practical because $7 for an entire year is significantly cheaper than what parents are willing to pay for SAT prep. Offering sample sentence starters for anonymous peer feedback is helpful because some students may be able to recognize when something is off about the wording, grammar, etc of a student's writing, but unclear how to address it in a constructive way. While annotating the reading passage, it would be helpful for this resource to have a pop-up dictionary, especially for ELL students who want to read the reading in English instead of the one offered in Spanish. Overall, this seems like a great resource!

Continue reading

Privacy Rating

Data Safety How safe is this product?

  • Users cannot interact with trusted users.
  • Personal information can be not displayed publicly.
  • Unclear whether user-created content is filtered for personal information before being made publicly visible.

Data Rights What rights do I have to the data?

  • Users can create or upload content.
  • Processes to access or review user data are available.
  • Processes to modify data are available for authorized users.

Ads & Tracking Are there advertisements or tracking?

  • Personal information is not shared for third-party marketing.
  • Traditional or contextual advertisements are displayed.
  • Personalised advertising is not displayed.

Continue reading about this tool's privacy practices, including data collection, sharing, and security.

See complete evaluation

Learn more about our privacy ratings