Website review by Stephanie Trautman, Common Sense Education | Updated August 2015
Hemingway Editor
Visit website

Hemingway Editor

Create clear, cohesive writing with easy-to-use online editor

Visit website
Learning rating
Editorial review by Common Sense Education
Community rating
Based on 1 review
Privacy rating
Not yet rated Expert evaluation by Common Sense
Grades
5–12 This grade range is based on learning appropriateness and doesn't take into account privacy. It's determined by Common Sense Education, not the product's publisher.
Subjects & Skills
English Language Arts, Communication & Collaboration, Critical Thinking
Price:  Free, Paid The website is free to use, but the desktop app (called Hemingway Editor 2.0) is $9.99 to download.
Platforms:  Website
See how we rate and review

Take a look inside

4 images
Use writing mode to write, then choose edit mode to see editing suggestions.
Hemingway Editor lets writers check their work's readability and fluency.
The editing process tells writers what to change and why.
Write for the web or for Microsoft Word.

Pros: Highlights common errors and helps readers be aware of simple fixes for better readability.

Cons: Bare-bones editing feedback isn't always correct; make changes at your own discretion.

Bottom Line: Measure readability of a piece and change language to push out strong pieces of writing.

How Can I Teach with This Tool?

Hemingway Editor will best help students improve their writing if it's paired with supplemental help from a teacher or a site with grammar and writing resources like Purdue OWL. High school students can use this site for nearly any writing assignment, and they likely know what things like passive voice and weak adverbs are and why they should omit them from their writing. Yet, middle school writers may need some scaffolding along the way. Teachers may want to create mini-lessons centered on the four aspects of writing Hemingway Editor will look to correct: awkward language, weak adverbs, simpler wording, and passive voice. The site could also be helpful with peer revision, allowing peer editors to sift through the site’s suggestions to discuss their usefulness with the writer.

Continue reading Show less
Standards:

Hemingway Editor is both a website and an app that writers can use to improve their craft. Used for writers of all ages, the site allows writers to type directly into the tool or copy and paste previously written pieces. Once your writing is complete or pasted in, a helpful counter indicates the number of paragraphs, sentences, words, characters, and letters, in addition to the time it would take an average reader to read the text. Once editing mode is activated, the site will identify common writing errors in the text by color-coding them: Different-colored highlighting  flags difficult-to-read sentences, adverbs, phrases in the passive voice, and words that could be written more simply. The editing mode also generates a readability score,  rating the writing with a coinciding grade level. 

The writer need not heed all of the site's flagged passages, but the advice can spur writers to consider their words in a new way. Keep in mind that the editor will tell writers what to change, but it won't indicate why that change would be desirable.

This tool was created for writers of all ages, and it's simple to use: Cut and paste your writing in the editor or type directly into the text box on the site, then click to get feedback. Although it wasn't created for educational settings, Hemingway Editor would be even more helpful if it flagged the reasons behind the edits it recommends. As it is, the editor lacks a bit in its helpfulness for young writers -- or any less-confident writers, really -- because it only tells writers what to change, not why or how to change it. More info on why writers should avoid the passive voice, for example, would help boost  this tool's utility in the classroom and its potential as a learning tool.

Editing and revision are key to developing writing skills; while this tool offers some feedback, its lack of context and explanation might not offer kids the kind of detailed response that would stick with them and help them compose their next big writing assignment. As it is, this is a nice way to spell-check and spot-check a piece of writing, but look elsewhere for more nuanced, scaffolded feedback to  help kids develop their writing skills.

Overall Rating
Engagement Would it motivate students and hold their interest? Is it visually appealing? Would it inspire teachers to try something new or change their instruction?

What student wouldn't want to be a better writer? Simple, engaging design will empower students to easily see which changes they can make to improve their writing.

Pedagogy Does the tool help teachers promote a more student-centered experience? Will students gain conceptual understanding or think critically? Does it deepen teachers’ pedagogical thinking?

Although the concept here is great, the site will only tell students what to change, not why to change it. Richer feedback would help students better target their work and hone their skills.

Support Can students and teachers get assistance when they need it? Is it created with people of different abilities and backgrounds in mind? Is learning reinforced and extended beyond the digital experience?

The site's pretty straightforward to use, but there isn't much help to support the experience. Teachers should supplement instruction to help students understand which changes to make and why.

Common Sense reviewer
Stephanie Trautman Classroom teacher
See how we rate and review

Key Standards Supported

Writing

  • W.7.4

    Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. (Grade-specific expectations for writing types are defined in standards 1–3 above.)

  • W.7.5

    With some guidance and support from peers and adults, develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on how well purpose and audience have been addressed.

  • W.8.5

    With some guidance and support from peers and adults, develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on how well purpose and audience have been addressed.

  • W.11-12.1c

    Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims.

  • W.11-12.2d

    Use precise language, domain-specific vocabulary, and techniques such as metaphor, simile, and analogy to manage the complexity of the topic.

  • W.11-12.2e

    Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.

  • W.11-12.3d

    Use precise words and phrases, telling details, and sensory language to convey a vivid picture of the experiences, events, setting, and/or characters.

Back to top

Community Rating

Write a review
Featured review by
Sara J. , Classroom teacher
Classroom teacher
Fort Bend ISD
Sugar Land, United States
More for fun than any serious feedback on quality writing
The only place where I see this being valuable would be for journalism. Being succinct and using active voice are hallmarks. When it comes to mimicking an author's style there is more to it than syntax, length, and avoiding adverbs. Style is a complex thing and the website is not going to be able to replicate it.
Read full review
Write a review

Privacy Rating

This tool has not yet been rated by our privacy team. Learn more about our privacy ratings

Explore Our Favorite Tools