Argument Wars

Argument Wars is an iCIvics game for the web, iOS, and Android. It uses a card game motif to give students a basic introduction to the constitutional arguments behind some important historical U.S. Supreme Court cases. Students choose one of the sides in each case and argue that position using some of the same arguments that were actually made, using their critical thinking skills to choose wisely. The side that makes the best case wins the game.

The cases include:

• Bond v. United States
• Brown v. Board of Education
• Gideon v. Wainwright
• Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
• In Re Gault
• Miranda v. Arizona
• New Jersey v. T.L.O.
• Snyder v. Phelps
• Texas v. Johnson

Students choose the game difficulty and the appearance of their lawyer, and then select one of the nine cases to argue and which side they'll argue. The chief justice asks which amendment or part of the U.S. Constitution underpins the case, and students choose from a few options described in plain English. A correct choice scores points. Students can only read through the opening statements from both lawyers (there are no choices there), but then players have four rounds to convince the justices of their side. They support their arguments by playing the strongest cards (and scoring more points than their opponent).

Players get dealt or choose cards that support or hurt their case. If they end up with no cards that will help their case, they can reset their hand once per round. On their turn, players have the option to play a red action card that gives special abilities, such as swapping out bad cards, choosing a card from the top three support cards, or explaining their argument further for extra points. Players who hold an objection action card can play that on their opponent's turn; objecting effectively earns points, while objecting incorrectly brings a penalty. After the possible action card play, students play a blue support card to help support their argument. Some of these cards support their case, some hurt it, and some are irrelevant to the current case. Students must choose wisely. If they aren't sure whether a card is helpful to their side, clicking the magnifying glass walks students through a series of analysis questions that help them figure it out. Once cards are played, justices give feedback about how well it supports the player's case. In the end, the player with the most points is declared the winner. The game then describes what actually happened in that historic case, and students can see a certificate that summarizes their gameplay.

Full Disclosure: iCivics and Common Sense Education have previously shared a funder; however, that relation has no impact on this review or learning rating.