Take a look inside 6 images
Case Maker
Pros: The mystery approach is cool; students investigate primary sources and compile evidence.
Cons: There's an assumption of prior knowledge, so teachers will need to customize and differentiate so that students aren't left behind.
Bottom Line: Makes the case for middle schoolers using primary sources, but this isn't gonna be a grab-and-go experience.
Case Maker assumes extensive prior knowledge, so teachers may want to use the site's challenges as a final assessment. For example, a larger study of immigration, citizenship, and the rights of U.S. citizens could then lead to cooperative group work on a Case Maker challenge as a synthesizing/culminating activity. There's a bunch to choose from, since challenges focus on the Japanese-American internment, the history of anger against immigrants, the path to citizenship over the past 100 years, and the relationship between federalism and Jim Crow laws.
Though it's designed for students to learn on their own, a whole-class preliminary exploration of one challenge would be helpful. Teachers can demonstrate how to move through the sources, compile evidence, and annotate each source to build everyone's confidence. Younger students and reluctant learners may need further customization, including a vocabulary list and preselected sources that lean on visual and audio supports.
Case Maker is a collection of 20 premade civics education challenges for middle school, made in partnership with the Library of Congress. It's free and requires the creation of an account. Teachers can assign a challenge either to a whole class or to an individual student by sharing the challenge code. Each challenge is a story-driven mystery that combines historical facts with current events. Topics include immigration, federalism, citizenship, and freedom of the press. They're framed by specific inquiry questions that help students connect personally and that challenge them to assess the potential bias of the source.
Students create a "case" (i.e., propose a solution) by exploring a range of related primary source documents and compiling them as evidence to support their opinion. Students work entirely on the website in the provided "work area" and click and drag sources to folders connected to their email address. Students then make annotations to the primary sources/evidence they've collected. Each case has a unique code students can use to return to their project and continue editing. Once they're done, they can share their case with the teacher as a presentation or use their work to create an outline for a report.
Critiquing primary sources can be a hard sell for students of any age, but especially for the reluctant middle schooler. By framing the civics education challenges as mysteries, Case Maker provides a different way to engage with historical documents and current events that students might otherwise think of as "boring." The range of primary sources will also be appealing to students. No matter the topic or challenge, students will find interesting things like posters and political cartoons alongside legislative bills and articles and even some videos. Students will also appreciate the ease with which they can use their work in Case Maker to create work products they can turn in to teachers, such as a digital outline for a written assignment. Case Maker also auto-generates a presentation for students that compiles their evidence and opinion.
That said, Case Maker is not a grab-and-go tool. Teachers will need to set aside a good deal of time not only to customize the challenges, but also to prepare students to use the site independently. In many cases, this'll involve some lessons that give students sufficient background knowledge. Thankfully, there's solid support within the tool for differentiation via customizable challenges.