Review by Marianne Rogowski, Common Sense Education | Updated January 2020
Get it now

Socratic by Google

Get it now

Instant answers plus explanations outweigh cheating concerns

Subjects & skills
Subjects
  • English Language Arts
  • Math
  • Science
  • Social Studies

Skills
N/A
Grades This grade range is based on learning appropriateness and doesn't take into account privacy. It's determined by Common Sense Education, not the product's publisher.
7–12
Common Sense says (See details)
Teachers say (0)
Not yet reviewed
Privacy rating (How we rate)
Not yet rated

Take a look inside

8 images

Pros: Links to explanations and resources can really aid student understanding and provide valuable learning opportunities when teachers aren't accessible.

Cons: There's no guarantee kids are going to use this app to learn; some will just want quick answers.

Bottom Line: Used wisely, this reference tool has the capacity to amplify learning and aid students on their own time and terms.

Socratic by Google challenges teachers to move away from busywork and drill-and-kill homework and toward assignments where students must demonstrate their thinking. Let students check their work and discuss the process they used in small groups. Assign challenge questions to move students ahead, or use the app to review past material or provide remediation for students who need extra support. Or have kids look at the resources that questions generate and then use a tool like Flipgrid or Screencast-O-Matic to explain their thinking about how they arrived at the answer.

Inevitably, some students will just use the app to get the answers, so teachers need to include questions that will require students to show mastery of a concept; teachers who stress process over product will appreciate this tool. Judicious use of the app can give students additional assistance and in-depth explanations that will solidify and enhance learning.

Continue reading Show less

Socratic by Google is an app that uses AI technology to search the web for resources, explanations, and answers to students' questions. Students speak, type in, or snap a picture of a typed or handwritten question and instantly receive multiple resources containing explanations and answers. Answers appear in one or more pages containing videos from YouTube and Khan Academy, information from Wikipedia, images, and more.

When students search for questions in math, step-by-step directions (with hints) are often included. However, students may also get results that are irrelevant. For example, a search for the problem "What is 8x4?" returned sites containing the steps to arrive at the correct answer along with several additional links to unrelated information. Science, English-language arts, and social studies aren't left out here; however, the results may not be as precise or voluminous as they are for math. Students may find that not every answer in Socratic by Google is useful or correct, and not every question is readable. Kids will need to learn when it's effective and should verify information using multiple resources and their own critical-thinking skills. 

Used judiciously, Socratic by Google promotes metacognition by encouraging students to think about how they can solve a problem or answer a question, rather than give up in frustration. The cards provided with each question form an automatic resource playlist of sorts, providing kids with opportunities to deepen understanding. Depending on the question, students may get answers in the form of text, images, video, audio, or all four, providing instant support for students with different learning preferences. Whether they're reviewing class concepts, checking their work, or getting a head start on future topics, students will find the app makes the typical Google search less overwhelming by narrowing down results to only a handful of the most relevant ones.

Some will argue that apps like this promote cheating, and it's entirely possible that students will take advantage of the ability to find answers without putting in the work. However, motivated students can find other ways to cheat if they're so inclined. That fact shouldn't discourage educators from encouraging the use of tools like this to fill in gaps in understanding and to learn difficult concepts. You'll have to teach kids how to use the information they find to deepen understanding -- for many, this won't be an intuitive process. Also, since the questions may provide incorrect answers or results from unreliable sources, it's important to stress the application of reason and good judgment when using the tool.

Overall Rating

Engagement Is the product stimulating, entertaining, and engrossing? Will kids want to return?

To the extent that students are motivated to learn, they'll like the tool for its novelty and ability to provide instant answers and a variety of useful resources.

Pedagogy Is learning content seamlessly baked-in, and do kids build conceptual understanding? Is the product adaptable and empowering? Will skills transfer?

Despite potential concerns about cheating, there's more benefit than risk; students who seek to understand concepts or fill in learning gaps will appreciate quick access to relevant information.

Support Does the product take into account learners of varying abilities, skill levels, and learning styles? Does it address both struggling and advanced students?

It's simple to use and addresses various learning needs by providing results in different formats, but not all of the resources contain sufficient accessibility features.


Common Sense Reviewer
Marianne Rogowski Media specialist/librarian

Teacher Reviews

There aren't any teacher reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool.

Write a review

Privacy Rating

This tool has not yet been rated by our privacy team. Learn more about how we rate