Review by Jenny Bristol, Common Sense Education | Updated December 2013

Enercities

Environmentally-minded city sim models sustainable building

Subjects & skills
Subjects
  • Science
  • Social Studies
Skills
  • Character & SEL
  • Critical Thinking
Grades This grade range is based on learning appropriateness and doesn't take into account privacy. It's determined by Common Sense Education, not the product's publisher.
6–12
Common Sense says (See details)
Teachers say (2 Reviews)
Privacy rating (How we rate)
Not yet rated
Price:  Free
Platforms:  Linux, Mac, Windows

Take a look inside

4 images
Players start with a town center, in 2010, and try to raise their population to 200.
Clear tutorials go a long way to making sure kids know why they are taking each action.
By upgrading buildings, kids implement recycling and efficiency programs.
Clear scoring allows students to compare notes, and try to beat their personal best.

Pros: Variety of ecological, economic, and technoloical issues organically woven into play.

Cons: Won't impress SimCIty devotees, and a bit brief.

Bottom Line: It carves out a useful niche in a popular genre, showing how city planning, technological development, economics, and quality of life intersect with sustainability.

How Can I Teach with This Tool?

Teachers can use Enercities as a poignant introduction to renewable resources, and to drive home the need to figure out alternatives to fossil fuels. It should work great as a discussion starter, or as a lead-in to research or building projects where students have to think through and/or create models for sustainability in their communities. Kids could also think large scale, and build models of future cities that make better use of resources. It's probably best played individually, and teachers may want to pause play and address questions for the edification of the whole class as they arise. Take note that the Enercities website also has decent lesson plans that might provide inspiration.

Continue reading Show less
Standards:

Enercities is a more stripped down SimCity style game where students take charge of planning a sustainable, 200 person community of the future. Students build a city, placing power grids, housing developments, industrial zones, and parks. Since it's focused on sustainable development and communities, students need to strike a balance between economy, ecology, population growth, and quality of life by building the right stuff, and making good use of upgrades. Upgrades provide perks that improve energy efficiency, lower carbon footprints, etc. 

By responsibly managing a growing community, kids learn about resource scarcity, the environmental impact of development, and sustainable building practices, all of which are critical to understanding the modern world. Kids also practice valuable skills like time, resource, and money management, and see how each of these skills and all of the covered issues are caught in an interconnected web. Kids will gain fresh perspective on the costs of fossil fuels and the need for clean energy, as they struggle to curb carbon footprint and deal with population growth.

Overall Rating
Engagement Is the product stimulating, entertaining, and engrossing? Will kids want to return?

Kids will dive into this intuitive and interesting SimCity-like game. They're likely to want to play again and again, trying to improve their performance and beat their high scores.

Pedagogy Is learning content seamlessly baked-in, and do kids build conceptual understanding? Is the product adaptable and empowering? Will skills transfer?

Kids must make careful choices to manage the economy, energy grid, and population growth. This carries a powerful message about resource management, green energy, and the role of buisinesses in a community.

Support Does the product take into account learners of varying abilities, skill levels, and learning styles? Does it address both struggling and advanced students?

A great tutorial and a clear scoring system starts kids off on the right foot. The game supports 12 major languages, but the text is not read out loud for players. Extensive help is available through downloadable lesson plans.

Common Sense Reviewer
Jenny Bristol Other
About our ratings and privacy evaluation.

Key Standards Supported

Earth and Human Activity

  • 4-ESS3-1

    Obtain and combine information to describe that energy and fuels are derived from natural resources and their uses affect the environment.

  • HS-ESS3-2

    Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.

  • HS-ESS3-3

    Create a computational simulation to illustrate the relationships among management of natural resources, the sustainability of human populations, and biodiversity.

  • MS-ESS3-3

    Apply scientific principles to design a method for monitoring and minimizing a human impact on the environment.

  • MS-ESS3-4

    Construct an argument supported by evidence for how increases in human population and per-capita consumption of natural resources impact Earth’s systems.

Engineering Design

  • 3-5-ETS1-1

    Define a simple design problem reflecting a need or a want that includes specified criteria for success and constraints on materials, time, or cost.

  • 3-5-ETS1-2

    Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.

  • 3-5-ETS1-3

    Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can be improved.

  • MS-ETS1-1

    Define the criteria and constraints of a design problem with sufficient precision to ensure a successful solution, taking into account relevant scientific principles and potential impacts on people and the natural environment that may limit possible solutions.

  • MS-ETS1-2

    Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.

  • MS-ETS1-3

    Analyze data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions to identify the best characteristics of each that can be combined into a new solution to better meet the criteria for success.

Back to top

Teacher Reviews

(See all 2 reviews) (2 reviews) Write a review
Featured review by
Matt M. , Classroom teacher
Classroom teacher
Deer Valley High School
Glendale, United States
A game that allows students to manipulate a city and observe the ecological impacts over time.
I think this would be neat as an extension activity and to reinforce concepts covered in class. The game is 3D, although the graphics are not the best. I do like that students can build their own cities and try to figure out how to make an environmentally friendly city. The game offers a forum which has been used to discuss game strategy. I noticed some people were trying to design a city that produced no negative effects on the ecosystem.
Read full review
Write a review

Privacy Rating

This tool has not yet been rated by our privacy team. Learn more about how we rate

Explore Our Favorite Tools