Teacher Review for ThinkCERCA

Easy, independent reading test preparation that creates data based on class and student performance.

Ashley K.
STEM Project Manager
Show More
My Subjects Math, Science
My Rating
Learning Scores
My Students Liked It Yes
My Students Learned Yes
I Would Recommend It Yes
Setup Time Less than 5 minutes
Great for Further application
Knowledge gain
Student-driven work
Teacher-led lessons
Great with Advanced learners
How I Use It
I used this as a test-taking preparation activity for an 8th grade group. These students covered a wide variety of reading levels and it was good to get a benchmark for where their reading abilities were, compared to the standards. I assigned the high interest articles, info-graphics, and videos and let student practice retrieving and answering questions from each article. I set a "due" date so that students knew what to expect throughout the week. I gathered information based on student performance, which then led me to reteach several test taking strategies.
My Take
The site is limited in the articles that are provided without a subscription. I thought that, in general, the reading passages were challenging. Because of this, I assigned the lower grade level equivalent to my lower level students (my 8th graders were reading 4th grade articles). I liked that I could assign individual students an article or the entire class. The articles were interesting enough that even though they might be reading on a lower level, my students were still engaged. Some of the paid subscription services that are missing from the free version: I would like the ability to search through other articles based on those missed standards, so that students can practice them until they are mastered. Additionally, I’d love to see a life-time ability for students to discover trends or standards that they regularly missed. I could manually click between article question results to determine which standards individual students mastered, but if there was a way to pull a report with this information, that might make it an easier tool to use to pull data. Additionally, I would love to see more done with the vocabulary component: words are introduced with the article but are set aside in the free version of the site.