Beyond the Bubble
Not Yet Rated
- applying information
- asking questions
- thinking critically
ProsThe assessments reward critical thinking vs. memorization; the rubrics and student samples aid implementation.
ConsNo supports for ELLs or other students with language challenges who may have trouble with the complex documents.
Bottom LineA ready-to-go, pedagogically sound route for re-focusing formative assessment on critical thinking and literacy rather than memorization.
Common Sense Reviewer
Students will appreciate ditching multiple choice tests for assessments that focus on critical thinking. Interest-level will depend on content and instruction related to the assessment.
Assessments require students to go beyond the facts and apply historical thinking to core content and primary sources. Each assessment is aligned to the Common Core.
Resources are classroom-ready. Rubrics, student samples, and downloadable materials make the assessments easy-to-implement..
First, teachers should take some time to review Beyond the Bubble's approach to assessment. To start, use the short assessments to monitor student learning throughout a unit. If you're hooked, consider revising your approach to student evaluation throughout a school year. Beyond the Bubble provides users with a group of core assessments and also a list of all of the assessments available in chronological order. Teachers can find assessments that emphasize a particular skill -- such as a sourcing or contextualization -- as well as ones that match with the content they are studying to add depth to student learning. For example, in a unit on World War I, teachers can use the Debate over the League of Nations materials to assess how well students can draw conclusions about differing historical perspectives and attitudes; using the Women's Rights materials, teachers can assess students' contextualization of two historical documents chronologically. In all cases, the assessments build a bridge between content knowledge and historical thinking, and offer teachers a way to see how well students are putting knowledge to use.Read more Read less
Developed by the Stanford History Education Group and using the vast collection of historical documents at the Library of Congress, Beyond the Bubble provides teachers with short, easy to administer assessments. These, however, aren't typical history quizzes and tests. The goal of Beyond the Bubble assessments is to move away from fact-based, multiple choice tests and quizzes and toward an evaluation of historical thinking skills and development of academic literacy. To do so, the site offers a range of assessments, called Historical Assessments of Thinking (HATs), that include a document, assessment questions, an interactive rubric, student samples, videos on related content, and links to similar types of assessments. For example, an assessment on American Imperialism emphasizes background knowledge, contexualization, and corroboration as students make connections between a photograph of Filipino prisoners with the explosion of the US Maine and the belief in Social Darwinism. Teachers are provided with the student-facing materials for the assessment and a rubric that highlights student responses at the proficient, emergent, and basic levels.Read more Read less
Teachers often don't change their curriculum is because they don't have time to develop new material. Beyond the Bubble makes it easier for teachers to make a curricular shift by doing a lot of the necessary heavy lifting: there's a set of curated historical documents as well as assessments questions, rubrics, and real examples of student work. The pedagogy -- aimed at historical thinking vs. factual knowledge -- is also sound: HATs emphasize higher-order skills such as critical thinking and analytical reasoning. Students will particularly benefit from building these skills, and requisite content knowledge, through deep engagement with fascinating, authentic historical documents tied to important social, cultural, and historical topics. Beyond the Bubble's methodology challenges teachers to upgrade their assessment practices and challenges students to practice real analytical research that thinks through primary documents.Read more Read less