Review by Jenny Bristol, Common Sense Education | Updated March 2014

We The Jury

Name: We The Jury
Item: We The Jury
Rating: 4
Author: Jenny Bristol

Evaluate evidence, build consensus in jury deliberation sim

Subjects & skills

Grades This grade range is based on learning appropriateness and doesn't take into account privacy. It's determined by Common Sense Education, not the product's publisher.

6–12

Common Sense says (See details)

Teachers say (0)

Not yet reviewed

Privacy rating (How we rate)

Not yet rated

Take a look inside

4 images

A thorough tutorial helps students get started.

Students may choose from a variety of cases to decide.

Diversity makes a strong appearance in the form of the six jurors.

Students must convince other jurors to join their position before time runs out, or the case will result in a hung jury.

Pros: The variation in laws and scenarios pushes students to think critically before they vote.

Cons: Only scratches the surface of each law.

Bottom Line: This distills down the jury process to its essential -- and most interesting -- elements showing students the critical and difficult responsibilities of jurors and how the deliberation process ties to argumentation, persuasion, and civics.

How Can I Teach with This Tool?

ELA teachers can use We The Jury to give students practice in evaluating primary sources, analyzing evidence, and persuading others of their positions. It would pair well with a persuasive writing exercise focused on a contentious issue currently being debated within State Supreme Courts or the US Supreme Court. Students could also play Supreme Decision and Argument Wars from the iCivics curriculum to get some extra perspectives and skills.

What Is It?

We The Jury is a civics game designed to introduce students to the basic responsibilities and work of a juror. Having lost their notes, students must rely on evidence presented (somewhat) impartially by the other jurors over a period of five in-game days. Students must weigh evidence against standing laws, and must talk with all of the jurors to glean a complete picture of the case. Throughout, students attempt to convince the rest of the jury to join their position, with the consequence of failure being a hung jury. There is a relatively steep learning curve, but once students get oriented, it's pretty straightforward.

Full Disclosure: iCivics and Common Sense Education share a funder; however, that relationship does not impact Common Sense Education's editorial independence and this learning rating.

Is It Good for Learning?

By talking with other jurors, students unlock evidence that exposes them to relevant laws and forms of evidence. This ultimately helps them understand a few important things: (1) the jury deliberation process; (2) the structure of arguments; (3) the ethics of our justice system. To evaluate evidence and perspectives, students use critical thinking skills so they make the right judgment about the case. They're also given practice being fair and flexible, since the unlocked evidence should -- if they're being attentive and just -- force them to re-evaluate their positions on the matter. To keep things interesting, and to drive these lessons home, none of the cases are open/shut. Each of the scenarios requires evaluation and diligence before votes are finalized.

Rating Details

Overall Rating

Engagement Would it motivate students and hold their interest? Is it visually appealing? Would it inspire teachers to try something new or change their instruction?

Rather than sitting through boring testimony, students analyze evidence that other jurors bring to deliberation. Convincing the other jurors to vote unanimously is an interesting intellectual challenge.

Pedagogy Does the tool help teachers promote a more student-centered experience? Will students gain conceptual understanding or think critically? Does it deepen teachers’ pedagogical thinking?

Students get exposed to a variety of actual laws as they help determine the outcome of each case.

Support Can students and teachers get assistance when they need it? Is it created with people of different abilities and backgrounds in mind? Is learning reinforced and extended beyond the digital experience?

Helpful tutorials ease students in. Students can also see how the other jurors may vote, how long they have to convince the other jurors, and evidence each juror has brought to the table.

Common Sense Reviewer

Jenny Bristol Other

About our ratings and privacy evaluation.

Teacher Reviews

There aren't any teacher reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool.

Write a review

This tool has not yet been rated by our privacy team. Learn more about how we rate