App review by Caryn Lix, Common Sense Education | Updated September 2014

Possible Worlds

Name: Possible Worlds
Item: Possible Worlds
Rating: 4
Author: Caryn Lix

Entertaining, well-researched games correct scientific misconceptions

Learning rating

See full review

Community rating

Based on 1 review

Privacy rating

Not yet rated Expert evaluation by Common Sense

Grades

4–12

Subjects & Skills

Science, Critical Thinking

Take a look inside

4 images

Use puzzles to learn about molecular alignment in electricity.

Participate in photosynthesis to gain a better understanding of the chemical process.

Learn scientific terminology in Heredity.

Discover the actual processes of heat transfer through gameplay.

Pros: Lots of support materials and solid grounding in learning science.

Cons: Content is limited, and activities may take quite a bit of time.

Bottom Line: Offers a helpful supplement to teacher-led instruction backed by an expert understanding of how kids learn and the key scientific concepts they need to know but often misunderstand.

How Can I Teach with This Tool?

There are excellent supplemental materials and lesson plans designed to guide teachers through all the possible worlds. The best way to use these games is precisely as suggested because the lesson plans have a wide scope, even including pre-made slideshows. It would be perfectly feasible, however, for a teacher to use the games as review or to encourage critical thinking by students. Adventurous teachers could encourage students to come up with other ideas about common scientific misconceptions and design their own games or stories to address those issues.

What Is It?

Developed by the National Research and Development Center on Instructional Technology, Possible Worlds is a collection of learning games designed to teach commonly misunderstood scientific concepts well by using best practices in pedagogy and conceptual learning. The covered concepts include photosynthesis, heredity, electricity, and heat transfer -- each tackled in a different game. The games are designed to be easy to play, with simple narratives and featuring different, familiar genres like adventure and platforming. Play is supported by useful extensions and activities that build critical thinking and that meld well with teachers' instructional needs.

Is It Good for Learning?

The Possible Worlds website is well-researched and meticulously organized. Each game is accompanied by suggested lesson plans and supplemental materials to help teachers communicate the concepts as thoroughly as possible. The site's developers understand that many scientific concepts are difficult to comprehend and easily misunderstood. These games target those misunderstandings, helping students clarify common misconceptions rather than teaching core concepts. Games aren't designed to replace teacher-led learning, but to supplement it. When used in this context, they're engaging ways to help students understand difficult ideas.

Learning Rating

Overall Rating

Engagement

Fun games wrapped in a bright comic style open the door to difficult concepts.

Pedagogy

Content and delivery are meticulously researched and tuned specifically to important conceptual misunderstandings and classroom needs.

Support

Games are generally straightforward, and a helpful robot clues in kids if they need direction. Implementation is easy, with solid, ready-to-go lessons.

Common Sense reviewer

Caryn Lix Classroom teacher

See how we rate and review

Community Rating

Write a review

Featured review by
Sandy W. , Classroom teacher

Classroom teacher

Catalyst Charter Middle School
Ripon, United States

Possible Worlds Captures Attention, But Lacked Depth

The use of games in the classroom needs to serve a purpose and connect to the content that is being taught in an innovative way. I was disappointed in the actual game-play of Possible Worlds. I did not complete the game due to the difficulty of maneuvering through the challenges of jumping and running throughout the game. Additional teacher materials were excellent, but the game itself did not offer a strong connection to the science concepts being taught. Students that are avid gamers would probably ...

Read full review