App review by Amanda Bindel, Common Sense Education | Updated October 2015

Get it now

SnapSchool

Name: SnapSchool
Item: SnapSchool
Rating: 2
Author: Amanda Bindel

Crowd-sourced homework help might lead students astray

Get it now

Learning rating

Editorial review by Common Sense Education

Community rating

Not yet reviewed Write a review

Privacy rating

Not yet rated Expert evaluation by Common Sense

Grades

6–12 This grade range is based on learning appropriateness and doesn't take into account privacy. It's determined by Common Sense Education, not the product's publisher.

Subjects & Skills

College & Career Prep

Great for

Productivity

Take a look inside

5 images

Post images of homework questions and get responses from other users.

Questions are titled by poster and show up in a grade-level feed.

Earn tokens and gems for helping others and redeem them to post questions.

Pros: Students vote answers up or down, which can help with identifying the best answers.

Cons: User-submitted homework images are often low-quality, and answers are unreliable.

Bottom Line: More trustworthy and productive methods for collaboration and help abound.

How Can I Teach with This Tool?

Teachers should just be aware that SnapSchool exists and that students may try using it to find homework help. It could be helpful to have a conversation with students about reliable and useful ways to get homework help: from tutorials to study buddies to classroom-based social media options like Google Classroom. Particularly valuable would be helping students to understand what's valuable about peer-to-peer learning and how to foster it.

What Is It?

SnapSchool is a social network that lets kids post their homework questions or help other kids with their homework. It's for students in grades six and above, and there are no age restrictions in the terms of service. Kids create an account, enter a username, password, birth date, and grade level. They can also connect through their Facebook login, in which case their full name is visible to anyone using the app. Kids earn tokens and gems for answering other kids' homework questions and for their answers getting up votes. They can redeem tokens and gems in order to post their own homework questions. Additional token and gem packs are available as an in-app purchase.

After registering, students see a feed of homework questions. Clicking each entry (displayed only as a title) brings up a screenshot of the inquiring student's homework with any comments or questions they've added. Other students can then post an answer as well as view other submitted answers and give those a thumbs up or thumbs down. Kids can also share other people's homework questions via connected social media or report inappropriate content, violent language, spam, or illegible posts.

Is It Good for Learning?

Crowd-sourcing homework help is not the best way to learn anything, and the implementation of this social media model fails for several reasons. Some teachers might consider this kind of help ineffective for learning or maybe even outright cheating. The up-voting system, while meant to surface potentially good answers, carries no guarantee that students are getting accurate help or answers. Beyond those issues, SnapSchool just doesn't work well. Posting answers from the camera roll, which is the more effective way to demonstrate a math problem, causes crashes. Many of the photos posted of worksheets or questions are out of focus or at odd angles. Finally, there's no urgency for getting answers. Most kids posting homework problems are looking for immediate help, which can't be guaranteed via the social media model here.

Learning Rating

Overall Rating

Engagement Would it motivate students and hold their interest? Is it visually appealing? Would it inspire teachers to try something new or change their instruction?

Connecting with other students and seeing what kind of work they're doing is interesting. In terms of design, while it's nicely laid out, the camera integration causes crashes and many homework images are blurry and difficult to read.

Pedagogy Does the tool help teachers promote a more student-centered experience? Will students gain conceptual understanding or think critically? Does it deepen teachers’ pedagogical thinking?

Peer tutoring is a great learning method in a more transparent and personal environment, but it doesn't lend itself as well to crowdsourcing.

Support Can students and teachers get assistance when they need it? Is it created with people of different abilities and backgrounds in mind? Is learning reinforced and extended beyond the digital experience?

Students won't necessarily get immediate answers to the questions they post, and there's no way to verify correct answers beyond the popularity of up and down votes.

Common Sense reviewer

Amanda Bindel Classroom teacher

See how we rate and review

Community Rating

No one has reviewed this tool yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Add your rating

This tool has not yet been rated by our privacy team. Learn more about our privacy ratings