Common Sense Review
Updated September 2014 - learn a language with vocabulary and articles

Inconsistent user experience mars terrific language-learning concept
Common Sense Rating 2
  • Students learn language skills through immersion in a target language.
  • Kids craft a dictionary of words they already know and add to it by clicking words as they read.
  • Kids use words from the dictionary to receive a selection of suggested articles containing those words.
  • Tap an unfamiliar word to see its definition and create a flaschard.
  • Highlighted words automatically appear on flashcards, which show up with an often iffy Bing image.
Built-in dictionary comprised of user-generated and user-discovered words is a smart, thoughtful approach to language learning.
Available articles rely heavily on user input. Flashcard images can be inappropriate and difficult to change.
Bottom Line
While the concept is great, uneven features and iffy images make this a questionable choice for the classroom.
Patricia Monticello Kievlan
Common Sense Reviewer
Foundation/Non-Profit Member
Common Sense Rating 2
Engagement Is the product stimulating, entertaining, and engrossing? Will kids want to return? 2

Kids will enjoy browsing articles by topic based on their interests; however, selection is often slim and articles are extremely short.

Pedagogy Is learning content seamlessly baked-in, and do kids build conceptual understanding? Is the product adaptable and empowering? Will skills transfer? 3

The idea of learning vocabulary in context is solid and could offer great motivation. Unfortunately, users have to enter a great deal of vocabulary on their own to make full use of the feature.

Support Does the product take into account learners of varying abilities, skill levels, and learning styles? Does it address both struggling and advanced students? 2

Although pronunciation features are useful for some words, many other words (especially grammatical particles) are not available in the dictionary, which makes it tough to build fluency.

About our ratings and privacy evaluation.
How Can Teachers Use It?

Have kids input their latest (or most troublesome) vocabulary words into the word list and browse articles to build fluency. Brainstorm a list of words that might fit one of the pre-set categories (like arts, food, or education) and add them to the vocab list to get a wider reading list on the subjects they enjoy. Challenge kids to read widely, sampling articles from several categories within the app. 

Read More Read Less
What's It Like?

This language-learning app lets users review vocabulary by reading online news articles in the target language. Users set their native language and a target language (one must be English) and add words they already know to the app’s dictionary. The app then generates a reading list of brief news articles and headlines featuring those words. Users can manually add new words by tapping words within articles, and can quiz themselves on flashcards they create for each word.

It’s important to note the app doesn’t work without an Internet connection. Additionally, flashcards automatically include images from the Bing search engine, and results can be uneven at best (an industrial meat slicer for the word slice) and inappropriate at worst (a series of appalling images for infected). A pop-up warns that images appear automatically and the app might not be appropriate for kids under 13. Some might feel it’s inappropriate for students of any age.

Read More Read Less
Is It Good For Learning?’s concept is brilliant: Scaffolding language-learning by starting with a few words kids know and building from there is a terrific idea. Unfortunately, the good intentions are unevenly executed. Populating the dictionary with key words turns out to be critical. Two words automatically included in every language are the words for “dog” and “cat,” and there are understandably few breaking news articles about dogs or cats. So it’s possible for the app’s reading section to turn up no search results if the dictionary is limited.

While spoken dictionary entries are well-pronounced and readers have great accents, it’s unfortunate more words aren’t available for definition, especially grammatical particles or words with different gender or number (perro and perras). While some are included, the differences aren't illustrated or explained. Additionally, when a word is clicked, it’s automatically added to the dictionary, but there’s no easy way to remove a word. Between the inconsistencies and the iffy flashcard images, you might want to look elsewhere for an appropriate classroom tool.

Read More Read Less

See how teachers are using - learn a language with vocabulary and articles

Teacher Reviews

Write Your Own Review