Teacher Review For Duolingo: Learn Languages Free

Impact Limited by the "Translation" Approach

Fanny P.
Technology coordinator
Mercedes-Benz International School
Show More
My Grades K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
My Subjects English Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies, Arts, World Languages, English Language Learning, Health & Wellness
Digitial Citizenship and EdTech Mentor
My Rating 3
Learning Scores
Engagement 3
Pedagogy 2
Support 3
My Students Liked It Yes
My Students Learned Yes
I Would Recommend It No
Setup Time Less than 5 minutes
Great for Individual
Knowledge gain
Great with Advanced learners
Special needs
How I Use It
I used Duolingo in Middle School with several grade levels in French (Foreign Language) I used this to make students practice structures and vocabulary in French. What worked: students learnt new words, revised some gramatical content. What didn't work: Because it relies on translation, this app is limited as sometimes the content cannot be 'literally" translated and students loose points because of the way the app expect the translation in English. It is also confusing for students to learn the word genders (feminine and masculine) because it does not exist in English so they don't think in the target language, they simply keep translating in English which does not make them think in the target language and conceptualize.
My Take
This tool is good for basic use OR for advanced learners who are aware of the "translation" problems and are still willing to use this app despite the problems they might encounter due to literal translation. I would suggest "Rosetta Stone" instead, which never relies on translation, but this product is expensive.